Search for: "Marshall v. Grant et al" Results 141 - 157 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
: (Spicy IP), India: OPPI recommends timeframe for pre-grant opposition: (Spicy IP), India: Jatropha patents (agri-biotech): (Spicy IP), India & US: Stem cell patents: (Spicy IP), Kenya: GSK presses Kenya to crack down on imports of fake medicines: (Afro-IP), Nigeria: Interview with Director General of NAFDAC - Cracking down on counterfeit drugs: (Afro-IP), EU: No link between parallel trade and reduction in R&D, says AG in Sot. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Aukerman, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitDAMON J. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
They went back to New York to copy the dresses and then [the Chicago-based department store Marshall] Field's brought the copies. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 11:05 am
Patriotic Fireworks, Inc., et al. , a 10-page opinion, Judge Darden writes:Indiana State Fire Marshal Roger Johnson ("the Fire Marshal"), in his official capacity, and the State of Indiana, (collectively "the State,") bring this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of the Fire Marshal's motion to dismiss the consolidated complaints of Patriotic Fireworks, Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:10 am
Remco Guy, et al. - "Because Taco Bell owed Winchell a duty as a matter of law and there are questions of fact regarding the elements of breach and causation, the trial court improperly granted Taco Bell's motion for summary judgment. [read post]