Search for: "Martin v. Public Defender's Office" Results 141 - 160 of 544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
The claimant, a pastor, alleged that the defendant, a former member of the London branch of his Gospel Church, defamed him in a video posted on his Facebook and YouTube channels. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Defendant was entitled to summary judgment. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 8:18 am
  Brown's defenders, of course, insist that Brown was essential for the passage of the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:44 am by Dan Markel
In Martin, the defendant had been convicted for being "drunk on a public highway. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Also, Barclays and UBS have reportedly hired criminal defense lawyers to represent employees with regard to the investigations.[15]   For the most part, the regulators that have made public statements about the investigations have only stated that the investigations remain in the early stages. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am by Chijioke Okorie
The Plaintiffs, Anselm Tryphone Ngaiza (popularly known as ‘Soggy Doggy Anter’), Florence Martin Kassela (‘Dataz’), and Enrico Figueiredo (‘Enrico’) had sued the Defendant for copyright infringement for using a song that was created by them, without their consent, in a movie that was produced and sold in 2005. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Martin Hickman continued to produce his regular (crowdfunded) reports on Byline:  Monday Wallis Feared Goodman Would Make “Wild Allegations” Tuesday, Top police officer backs News of the World Man;  Hacking Prosecution Defendant was a “company man”; Wednesday Jury “cannot be sure” Wallis is guilty; Thursday and Friday Neil Wallis Trial: Jury Out;  The jury’s deliberations will continue today.… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Summary terminations without a hearing have been upheld under different circumstances but that in each such case a statute that had been violated or a statute mandated the possession of the license or termination was mandated by law upon the conviction of a crime pursuant to Public Officers Law §30 [1] [e]. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:26 am by SHG
When the Supremes decided in Maryland v. [read post]