Search for: "Matheson"
Results 141 - 160
of 413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2014, 6:35 pm
Despite these benefits, significant enforcement challenges remain, and it can difficult to determine when a second medical use claim has been infringed.Sarah Matheson (Allens, Australia) gave an overview of the 43 national reports that were submitted on Q238. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:11 pm
On September 3, the Tenth Circuit (Tymkovich, McKay, Matheson) issued a decision in Biodiversity Conservation Alliance v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
Matheson predict life care planners will play an increasingly important role in personal injury damage analysis. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
This week’s summaries concern: Courts / Insurance / Torts / Brokers / Criminal Law / Evidence Matheson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Matheson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:39 am
Accordingly, the appeals court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the client on the employee’s Title VII wage discrimination and retaliatory termination claims (Knitter v Corvias Military Living, LLC fka Picerne Military Housing, LLC, July 15, 2014, Matheson, S, Jr). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:13 am
Matheson was not at fault in the accident. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:09 am
Joshua Congdon-Hohman and Victor Matheson A 2012 research paper titled "Potential Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Award of Life Care Expenses" and written by economists Joshua Congdon-Hohman and Victor Matheson provides a notable counter argument to Seth Cardeli's Trial Magazine article. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:15 am
Matheson, Jr wrote for the appellate panel. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:00 pm
Matheson to handle her estate. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:28 am
In a vigorous dissent, Judge O’Brien contended that she failed to establish that similar push-back by male employees had come close to her “critical, obnoxious, insulting, and accusatory behavior” (Potter v Synerlink Corp, April 21, 2014, Matheson, S). [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
As Judge Matheson put the question in his separate concurrence in Hobby Lobby, should “[t]he structural barriers of corporate law give [one] pause about whether the plaintiffs can have their corporate veil and pierce it too”? [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Mike Matheson of the State Department famously said that NATO tried to justify the action in a way that would “not weaken international legal constraints on the use of force,” and he listed the contextual factors preceding the intervention as a “pragmatic justification designed to provide a basis for moving forward without establishing new doctrines or precedents that might trouble individual NATO members or later haunt the Alliance if misused by others. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
Supreme Court Chief Justice Jacqueline Matheson, Barry Adams, and Marie-Claude Landry, the committee lamented the various judicial reviews Douglas has pursued and how those proceedings have interrupted their inquiry.The inquiry, which began with a hearing in May 2012 has been dogged by delays brought on by numerous judicial reviews and resignations of both the committee’s independent counsel Guy Pratte in August 2012 and the wholesale quitting of the inquiry panel. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
— This appeal by leave of this Court is from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, reflex, [1987] 4 W.W.R. 385, which affirmed the judgment at trial of Matheson J. of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench, reflex, [1984] 1 W.W.R. 15, dismissing the action of the plaintiff (appellant in this Court). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
[Bloggers Note: Today's guest column comes from noted Atlanta-based business immigration lawyer, Eileen M.G. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
[Bloggers Note: Today's guest column comes from noted Atlanta-based business immigration lawyer, Eileen M.G. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
[Bloggers Note: Today's guest column comes from noted Atlanta-based business immigration lawyer, Eileen M.G. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
As I write these words, the Supreme Court is being inundated with amicus briefs on both sides of the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases (more than four dozen, as of 6:00 p.m., with many more to come). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:01 am
“Although there is no clear legal rule as to how much overlap is needed among decision maker groups for employees to be similarly situated, requiring absolute congruence would too easily enable employers to evade liability for violation of federal employment laws,” the appeals court said (Smothers v Solvay Chemicals, Inc, January 21, 2014, Matheson, S Jr). [read post]
