Search for: "Matter of Beers v Beers" Results 141 - 160 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm
However, in DB Breweries Limited v Society of Beer Advocates, Inc [2011] NZIPOTM 19 the Commissioner found that SOBA stone-cold failed to prove its case in relation to the common knowledge and use of the word 'radler' as a descriptive term in New Zealand. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:02 am by John Steele
Advice from a judge: what you wear to court matters, and if you're accused of drunk driving, don't wear a tee shirt with a beer logo. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:21 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIMS OF: RYAN DORMAN, AN EMPLOYEE OF MELEHES BROTHERS, INC., v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 3:54 pm by Jon Ibanez
The California Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
An unprecedented cost award on a summary judgment motion recently in Hughes v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am by CMS
The Court of Appeal distinguished the principles in Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605 and in re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 and instead followed Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:12 am by Daniel Hope
The Court of Appeal held the principles in Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605 and in re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 not to apply. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Judge Thomas King Kistler of the Centre County Court of Common Pleas recently addressed pre-trial motions in limine pertaining to the admissibility of consumption of alcohol by both parties in a motor vehicle versus pedestrian accident in the case of Losch v. [read post]