Search for: "Matter of Caplan"
Results 141 - 160
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 7:24 am
He was joined on the panel by Fidelity’s senior tax counsel Jessica Reif-Caplan and Deloitte’s global tax leader, Rob Massey. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:57 pm
While there are many good points in the first half of the book, I agree with some of economist Bryan Caplan's criticisms of it. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
Canada In the case of Caplan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:22 am
Liberals, by contrast, appear to broach little disagreement from the orthodoxy on this issue (and others for that matter), and I think Haidt gives us a sense why. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
All you need to know about the industrial nature of this litigation is that the total attorneys’ time was 2.2 hours and that 14 different legal assistants billed time to the matter. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
Rowley, June 11, 2002: http://public.econ.duke.edu/Papers//Other/Tower/Protectionism.pdfBryan Caplan, “The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies,” Cato Institute, Policy Analysis No. 594, May 29, 2007: http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/myth-rational-voter-why-democracies-choose-bad-policies (pp. 1-19)1/28Trade Law and Institutions (U.S.)United States Constitution, Art. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
Fighting words include" 'those personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction ....'" There is nothing in the record to support, when respondent made any of the foregoing statements, he did so in a situation where it was "inherently likely to provoke violent reaction," considering he made the statements on the internet, in a public forum, far removed… [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
Rowley, June 11, 2002: http://public.econ.duke.edu/Papers//Other/Tower/Protectionism.pdfBryan Caplan, “The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies,” Cato Institute, Policy Analysis No. 594, May 29, 2007: http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/myth-rational-voter-why-democracies-choose-bad-policies (pp. 1-19)1/28Trade Law and Institutions (U.S.)United States Constitution, Art. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:26 pm
The quality and reach of thinkers' ideas surely matters more than how high their IQs are. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:29 am
If it didn’t matter to anyone, or to our society, how fast cars were driven on public roads in this country, we wouldn’t have a speed limit. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
Keays had the opportunity to reconsider its previous position on the matter, but refused to do so at para 67, as there was insufficient facts to make out a case for discrimination. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
Caplan; the National Writers Union, the Society of Professional Journalists, the NewsGuild-CWA, Euclid Media Group; and me. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
From State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 5:38 pm
Last week module three of the Leveson Inquiry – examining the press and politicians – came to an end as Lord Justice Leveson heard from MPs and journalists. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
The Daily Mail’s counsel, Jonathan Caplan, argued that the paper’s data requests outlined in the ‘What Price Privacy Now‘ report (2006) were legal. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 1:51 pm
It’s tempting to begin any discussion of digital preservation and law libraries with a mind-blowing statistic. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am
Once you leave California, default starts to look like an even better strategy, as shown in Caplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 5:06 pm
This week, part one of the Leveson inquiry ended with an update from the Metropolitan Police on ongoing investigations into alleged press illegality, and closing submissions from the majority of the core participants. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:09 pm
David Sherborne, representing core participant victims, read a short statement from the Dowler family, which thanked MacDonald as his team for investigating the matter. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal Biden’s Vow to Limit Ethics Conflicts Finds a Test Case: The Ricchetti brothers MSN – Michael Scherer and Sean Sullivan (Washington Post) | Published: 6/14/2021 President Biden vowed to ban his own family from involvement in government, disclose records of White House visitors, and support new legislation that would expand the definition of lobbying and mandate more detailed disclosure of contacts with White House officials. [read post]
