Search for: "Matter of Christine B."
Results 141 - 160
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
(b) An Order that he pay temporary spousal support to her in the sum of $200,000 per month retroactive to July 1, 2011; R. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:08 pm
The Collaborative Divorce Institute of Tampa Bay has elected its executive board, and below are the new officers: President: Christine Hearn Vice President: Adam B. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Moderator: Megan Carpenter, Texas Wesleyan University School of Law Speakers: Christine Haight Farley, American University, Washington College of Law What is art? [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 9:31 am
The matter was presented to a grand jury, which returned an indictment charging Michael with two counts of first-degree criminal contempt for placing Christine in fear of death or injury by telephone, and harassing her by repeated telephone calls with no purpose of legitimate communication (Penal Law § 215.51[b][iii], [iv], respectively). [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:42 am
Editors-in-Chief are Stephanie Davidson and Christine Kirchberger, to whom queries should be directed. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:56 am
In the end, does it matter? [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:05 am
They have 30 days to file notice of appeal (so the decision is not yet final); and while it’s not over until it’s over, we are close to conclusively resolving the matter. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:05 am
They have 30 days to file notice of appeal (so the decision is not yet final); and while it’s not over until it’s over, we are close to conclusively resolving the matter. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:05 am
They have 30 days to file notice of appeal (so the decision is not yet final); and while it’s not over until it’s over, we are close to conclusively resolving the matter. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/INcG7c (Charles Skamser) eDiscovery Case Law: Defendant Responds to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Recusal in Da Silva Moore – bit.ly/KnyPcm (Doug Austin) EDRM and Statistical Sampling - bit.ly/J8fKJ6 (Doug Austin) Email Admissibility: Double Hearsay Satisfied by (1) Business Record Incorporating (2) Admission – 801(d)(2)(B) Does Not Require Employee Have Ability to Bind Employer — Junior Status of Employee Goes to Weight –… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
By Kathryn Hines and Christine Steiner Society is consumed with celebrity. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
By Kathryn Hines and Christine Steiner Society is consumed with celebrity. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:47 am
By Kathryn Hines and Christine Steiner Society is consumed with celebrity. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:49 pm
- By Christine Duhaime (Duhaime Law) Our colleague Christine Duhaime has written this rather good comparative competition and terrorist financing note. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
bit.ly/w1LMYO (Thomas Smith, Matthew Collins) NLRB Report Challenges Validity of Many Commonly Used Social Media Policies - bit.ly/xCfcda (Philip Gordon) Obtaining Discovery in China for Use in US Litigation | China Law Insight - bit.ly/yJtH08 (Meg Utterback) Plaintiff Sanctioned for Burning Personal Computer - bit.ly/ykkVqe (K&L Gates) Printing ESI & Scanning It Is Not OK - bit.ly/xryUK2 (Josh Gilliland) Proposed EU Privacy Rules Add to the Burden on International Businesses - bit.ly/xa04Sz… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
See Christine A. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
: an examination of the Bowl Championship Series agreement under the Sherman Act, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 153 (2011)Victor Broccoli, Policing the digital wild West: NCAA recruiting regulations in the age of Facebook and Twitter, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 43 (2011)Christine A. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
As a matter of history, Supreme Court Justices rarely lose retention elections unless they have written controversial opinions or if the court itself has recently been involved in some sort of controversy. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am
As Wikipedia also notes, if Party A Serves a discovery request on Party B and Party B either objects to the request or doesn’t comply, Party A can “seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. [read post]
