Search for: "Matter of Davis v State of New York" Results 141 - 160 of 526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am by Betsy McKenzie
The decoration for this blogpost is courtesy of New York Magazine online, at a post from 2008, RIAA, What Settlement Money? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
  The editorial boards of the New York Times, L.A. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Nickie Mali Lum Davis pleaded guilty in 2020 to one count of aiding and abetting in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents,… [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the plaintiff’s loss of any claims against those attorneys was due to its own failure to pay the delinquent franchise taxes and to timely recommence the action against those attorneys (see CPLR 205[a]), and was not the result of Hurst’s delay in asserting the defense (see generally CPLR 203[f]; Pendleton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 736; [*3]cf. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
New York, which was the law at the time, but a few months after Davis’ conviction the Supreme Court reversed Belton in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Prahkin defendants served a timely notice of claim on the City of New York, but failed to do so with respect to the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter NYCTA). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
The New York Court of Appeals has applied the same principle to the due process guarantee in the state constitution. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]