Search for: "Matter of English v Smith"
Results 141 - 160
of 280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
Through these cases the High Court elected not to follow the English approach (see Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd) which requires that another forum is clearly or distinctly more appropriate. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
Randy Smith, accused the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable" but the majority held that "An actor's performance, when fixed, is copyrightable if it evinces 'some minimal degree of creativity ... no matter how crude, humble or obvious it might be". [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:46 am
Laird v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
I think Crawford v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
I think Crawford v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Does it matter? [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
Smith (1879), 11 Ch. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 13 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will give judgment in the case of Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors (heard on 3 December 2010). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
V .R. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
Baca and Chiafalo v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm
Causes of action for invasion of privacy exist in English and NZ law: Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457) and Hosking v Runting ([2005] 1 NZLR 1). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:45 am
It was Palsgraf v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog only. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Justice Smith, writing for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
The text which appears below is the English version of an English-and-French motion to which this Kat has added a few hyperlinks, and the names of some very impressive signatories and supporters.If the unitary patent package and unified patentcourt don't work out, does it help that we areall in it together? [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
As a result of the Court’s judgments in Smith v Dooley ([2013] NZCA 428), Young v TVNZ ([2014] NZCA 50) and Murray v Wishart ([2014] 3 NZLR 722, 729-731), the law in New Zealand currently seems to be that, depending on the circumstances of publication, a plaintiff may rely on other publications made subsequent to that complained of – even up to a year afterwards – to support the allegedly defamatory meanings said to arise. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:24 am
Omychund v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(IAM) Chinese brands: Does privatisation matter? [read post]
