Search for: "Matter of Jake M."
Results 141 - 160
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
(David Bernstein) Via Althouse, I learn the following from Jake Tapper:One rider [to the bill] – Section 2262 — de-funds certain White House adviser positions – or “czars. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
So anything that helps cancer patients cope is jake with me. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:48 am
I’m a huge believer in law firm blogs, but not at the cost of the blog’s claim to authenticity. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 5:07 pm
Other losers in the category: Kevin Spacey and jake gyllenhaal. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:31 am
It doesn’t matter.)What does matter is that you find a way to deploy whatever level of social skill that you have. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
I’m stepping in to fill a lat minute vacancy for one session: Social Media Policies: Crafting a Uniform Policy Across your Organization and Enforcing It. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:56 pm
I'm not saying you have to pick bland subject matter. [read post]
31 May 2010, 12:11 pm
I’m not at all sure why God has gotten so selective, but I’m grateful that the judiciary will at least retain enough independence to call this move by God “unfortunate. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
Robert O'Leary (Email), who supported the matter. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm
Does that matter? [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Both Jake and Charlie are criminal defense lawyers in Des Moines, Iowa. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm
It's hardly possible that Kennedy and his co-concurrers, or any sentient being, for that matter, actually hold that opinion. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Michael Jakes, bemüht sich, den einschlägigen Vorschriften eine möglichst breite Auslegung abzugewinnen. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
" "They are eligible for patenting under section 101," replied Jakes, referring to the section of the 1952 patent statute that governs what is patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm
JAKES: . . . [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm
JAKES: . . . [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
Jakes. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:59 am
These comments can be found here. **** Jeffrey M. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
GIBBS: Well, I think if you look at -- I think, not to mix networks here, but I think if -- I think your poll read -- Q They disapproved -- more people disapproved of the President's handling of health care than approved, which I think is what Jake was asking about. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
And I'm pleased that Congress has already embraced these proposals. [read post]
