Search for: "Matter of Kagan"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 9:14 am
And no matter what Kagan has said, Senator Cornyn is of the view that Kagan cannot answer those questions. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:04 pm
But the majority does not tell us why this difference matters. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm
Justice Kagan's Poker Prowess: Revealed on Jeopardy. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
The Court split 4-4 with Justice Kagan recused. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:54 pm
With due respect to Kagan, I don't see her changing that. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
He stated that a ” political party’s independent expression not only reflects its members’ views about the philosophical and governmental matters that bind them together, it also seeks to convince others to join those members in a practical democratic task, the task of creating a government that voters can instruct and hold responsible for subsequent success or failure. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:13 pm
(Not that it matters; just curious.)The Supreme Court's prior opinion in the case, Jan. 12, 2010, is here. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:40 am
When she was up for confirmation as SG, Kagan declined to say whether she agreed or disagreed with Heller, stating that as SG, her personal view of the matter would not be relevant. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
I doubt Specter will end up voting against confirmation, and I don’t think it will matter if he does. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:14 am
I don't know whether Kagan is empathetic or not, and I'll leave the question of whether it matters to my comments on Nate's post. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:53 am
Should be interesting:Abreu left Sox camp after Monday's game against the Cubs, and the Sox said only that he had to tend to personal matters in Miami. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Media Matters calls the editorial a “distortion” of Kagan’s record. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 11:11 am
Kagan explains that text, not intentions matters: But even assuming other Framers shared that outlook, it would not be enough. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 5:18 am
Yet Alito left no doubt where he stands on the matter. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:43 am
And I think it could certainly be used, or be perceived to be used by some as a way to discredit [Kagan], even though we all know that it does not matter and it should not matter. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:10 pm
When there is that kind of gross disparity in representation, it can matter and it's common sense. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:11 am
Given these prevailing public views, we should expect the Kagan confirmation process to transmit contradictory images of judicial decision-making, with a portrait of judging as a matter of reason and principle vying for attention with a picture of judging as a political enterprise. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
We're not referring to the thorny jurisprudential and ideological matters confronting the country's first Solicitrix General. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:32 pm
As a practical matter, this case will have little impact. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Kagan told the audience:For example, did the scarcity rationale ever make sense with respect to broadcasting? [read post]
