Search for: "Matter of Klines"
Results 141 - 160
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
The case arose out of incidents at a Black Lives Matter protest that was allegedly organized by well-known activist, Deray McKesson, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:26 am
They know that the rules don't matter if there is nobody there to enforce them. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
In 2011, the IRS settled a transfer pricing case with Western Union for $1.2 billion and in 2006, it settled with GlaxoSmith Kline for $3.4 billion. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:41 am
It was Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-Ky.) motion to table the veto message on the resolution that put the matter to rest—at least for that particular avenue of attack. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:56 am
Erik Paulsen, John Kline and Michele Bachmann, as well as Democratic Reps. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
Shanin Specter, of Kline & Specter, PC, who represents the plaintiffs, said simply, “We shall appeal. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 5:30 am
John Kline (R-MN), Ranking Republican on the House Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions Subcommittee. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:17 pm
Anthony Kline and Justice Paul R. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:43 am
A closer look at the circumstances of the JASA matter reveals that Picard appears to be using the JASA Lawsuit for several potential purposes: 1. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:19 pm
Finally, as with recent adjudicatory actions, this rulemaking action represents an abdication of the Board's representation case duties and reflects a compulsive effort by my colleagues to favor union organization over all opposition, no matter its legitimacy or statutory protection. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:55 pm
In deciding whether or not to require a PLA, agencies must conclude that use of a PLA will “advance the Federal Government’s interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement, producing labor-management stability, and ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing safety and health, equal employment opportunity, labor and employment standards, and other matters. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:56 am
Kline, the author of this entry and a co-author of this blog, is a partner with Fox Rothschild LLP, based in our Princeton, NJ office, and is a past Chair of the firm's Corporate Department. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
Nonetheless, it is clear that Judge Rakoff will be bringing a bold new perspective to issues in the Madoff bankruptcy, perhaps including the Wilpon/Katz matter. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
I’d anticipate a reversal here, although how far the Court will go is another matter; will it require, for example, testimony about breathalyzer calibration? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
In a related matter, Installment 41 discussed Statement 8 to the 2008 Form 990-PF provided to me by the accountant for the Foundation. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 5:28 am
In a letter sent yesterday by lone Republican Board Member Brian Hayes to Chairman John Kline (R-MN) of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Hayes expressed his serious concerns and more disconcerting circumstances than might have been anticipated: My colleagues are committed to issuing a final R Case Rule before Member Becker’s recess appointment expires at the end of the current Congressional session. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 4:04 am
Trumka pointed out that the package includes individuals who have challenged recent NLRB actions and whose views on labor relations matters are sometimes contrary to those of the union. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
Kline, Esq., for contributing this entry and for his on-going analysis of the concerns of Madoff stakeholders) [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:55 pm
Kline, the author of this entry and a co-author of this blog, is a partner with Fox Rothschild LLP, based in our Princeton, NJ office, and is a past Chair of the firm's Corporate Department. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
Geico decision literally and noted that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court “unequivocally” held that household exclusions are unenforceable as a matter of law as the exclusion violated the requirements set forth in Pennsylvania’s MVFRL that a carrier secure a written waiver or rejection of stacked UIM coverage for such waiver or rejection to be valid.In the separate case of Donegal Insurance v. [read post]
