Search for: "Matter of Lee v Lee"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:45 am
—Bill Lee 1Transpac Marine, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
Case Study Morrow v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
From Tharp v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:43 am
See Pitts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In Belya v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
”[14] The Release also compared the Section 404 requirements against Section 13(b)(2) by citing the Commission’s interpretive release from 1981: We have previously stated, as a matter of policy, that under Section 13(b)(2) “every public company needs to establish and maintain records of sufficient accuracy to meet adequately four interrelated objectives: appropriate reflection of corporate transactions and the disposition of assets; effective administration… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
WRAL reports here that the Supreme Court of North Carolina heard arguments this week in Community Success Initiative v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
From yesterday's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Henderson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Lee. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
” North Carolina militia leader Michael Lee Wells testified that Three Percenter group chats included calls to start “taking out” civilians in Democratic areas, as the “only way to stop the rioting. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm
Lee v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
Lee v United Kingdom [2022] ECHR Application no. 18860/19: The Supreme Court had upheld the refusal of Ashers Baking, on religious/moral grounds, to supply a cake to Mr Lee decorated with a colour picture of the Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie with the caption, “Support Gay Marriage”, and he challenged that decision at Strasbourg, on the grounds that it violated his Convention rights under Articles 8, 9, 10 and 14. [read post]
