Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy" Results 141 - 160 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 3:25 pm by Lisa Perrochet
The article observes that this was far more than the plaintiff had asked for, the defendant filed for bankruptcy, and the case (McCoy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
McCoy, which was issued on January 24, 2011, and Auer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d 438, 442 (2007), quoting McCoy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, Liotti's inexcusable failure to file timely opposition papers to the RICO defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint and to file a timely notice of appeal from the District Court's order granting such motion, clearly falls below the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession (see Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d at 1007; McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592, 593). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To determine timeliness, we consider whether plaintiff’s complaint must, as a matter of law, be read to allege damages suffered so early as to render the claim time-barred” IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132,139 [2009]. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In [*2]response, the plaintiff failed to present evidence establishing either that she commenced the action within the applicable three-year limitations period, or that the continuous representation toll applied in this case, since all of the documentary evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the legal representation had ended more than three years before this action was commenced, and there was no mutual understanding of a need for ongoing legal representation in the underlying… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:50 am by Susan Brenner
This mattered to McNeil because she claimed that, upon her arrest, McCoy chivalrously yelled from the patrol car that the drugs in her purse actually belonged to him. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legalresearch (see, Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006; McCoy v Tepper, 26 1 AD2d 592; Gardner v Jacon,148 AD2d 794, 796; Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645,646). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm by Ronald Mann
At Wednesday’s argument in Chase Bank USA v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:39 am by David G. Badertscher
McCoy SUFFOLK COUNTYCivil Practice Court Rejects Bid for Subpoena as Labor Union Leader Privilege Ruled Inapplicable Matter of Suffolk County Ethics Commission v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:45 am
"In contrast to the legal effect of an individual merely submitting a "request for reconsid­eration," suppose the administrative body actually agrees to reconsider the matter and issue a new determination. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, in opposition to the plaintiff's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the Meighan defendants failed to demonstrate the existence of any triable issues of fact with respect to their liability for legal malpractice (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Northrop v Thorsen, 46 AD3d 780, 784; Jampolskaya v Victor Gomelsky, P.C., 36 AD3d 761, 762). [read post]