Search for: "Matter of Ryan v. Supreme Court of the State of New York"
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am
Oneida Indian NationDocket: 10-72Issue(s): (1) Whether tribal sovereign immunity from suit bars taxing authorities from foreclosing to collect lawfully imposed property taxes; and (2) whether the ancient Oneida reservation in New York was disestablished or diminished.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (2d Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of the Town of Lenox, New YorkAmicus brief of the States of… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am
" As the Nevada Supreme Court noted in 2005, there are ample cases permitting malpractice suits following a supposedly insufficient settlement: See, e.g., Durkin v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Id.The market share claim was also dismissed under New York law, even though the New York Court of Appeals, in one of its whiftier moments (it’s normally a pretty conservative court on product liability matters) had allowed market share liability in a DES case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Furthermore, the Supreme Court has not overruled Ryan in its entirety, despite the 1972 amendments to the LWHCA. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 12:48 pm
For example, I was unable to change the jurisdiction from the Supreme Court to the Second Circuit. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
– Steve Limitiaco, Pacific Daily News, March 31, 2010 The Guam Waterworks Authority, which is years behind on court-ordered improvements to the island’s water and wastewater systems, plans to negotiate a new settlement agreement with the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Allison Winter, The New York Times, March 12, 2010 U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
The Supreme Court is adamant that restrictions on speech cannot be based on content. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court is adamant that restrictions on speech cannot be based on content. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:05 am
In a matter of first impression, the Delaware Supreme Court in Whittington v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
Facing Life in Prison," at the New York Times' The Bay Area blog. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., et al., No. 3835-VCN (Del. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Most Cited CasesPerformance of an agreement by payment of money alone is not enough, as a matter of law, to take the agreement out of the statute of frauds. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:02 am
Among them, on 12 February 2007, in the case Physicians for human rights et al. v. the Minister of Public Security et al.the Supreme Court held that the State had to provide a bed to every prisoner held in an Israeli prison. ...'ReliefWeb - OCHA Situation Reports - http://www.reliefweb.int/
Dallas DWI Lawyer, Attorney For DWI Defense, Texas Criminal ...By Mimi Coffey "As a matter of fact, the prosecutor commented in… [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
The Supreme Court struck down the law on the basis of "the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control," and it denied "any general power of the state to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
In a ruling that appears to be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, Master Harper of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory held that the lawyer could use the social networking site to serve court notices.1 The Facebook profiles showed the co-defendants’ dates of birth, email addresses and ‘friend’ lists and declared the co-defendants to be friends of one another. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've praised courts that have gotten this issue right - most significantly the New York Court of Appeals in the Arons case. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
The Court cited to New York v. [read post]
