Search for: "Matter of Snowden v Snowden" Results 141 - 160 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2015, 12:17 pm by Eva Galperin and Nate Cardozo
  Related Issues: Free SpeechAnonymityInternationalSurveillance and Human RightsPrivacySecurityState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Documents provided by Edward Snowden and published in the Guardian and the Washington Post name nine U.S. companies—Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, and Apple—as participants in the NSA’s PRISM program. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Among the more important and recent examples are the cases of Binyam Mohamed and Edward Snowden. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:13 am by Inside Privacy
This is when Edward Snowden made his revelations about the collection of data by the NSA. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am by Clara Spera
On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), after four years of litigation, shifted its strategy in its banner NSA case, Jewel v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am by Wells Bennett
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am by Graham Smith
Much post-Snowden attention has been directed to GCHQ’s TEMPORA programme, authorised (so it is thought) by a rolling series of external interception warrants under section 8(4) of RIPA. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm by Amul Kalia
Related Issues: PrivacyCALEAEncrypting the WebLaw Enforcement AccessSecurityRelated Cases: Bernstein v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 8:23 am by Root Jonez
For example, in Latin America, constitutional and human rights courts have produced interesting decisions on the matter. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am by Jane Chong
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Darius Whelan
 He also noted that mass and indiscriminate surveillance of communications as shown by the Snowden revelations would, as a matter of Irish law, be unconstitutional, but that Irish law on this matter had effectively been pre-empted by EU law.] [read post]