Search for: "Matter of Sorrell" Results 141 - 160 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 5:46 am by Jim Sedor
The Government Accountability Board will take up the issue on May 21, but the matter may ultimately be decided by the courts. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:37 pm by Berin Szoka
This system does much to ensure that minors cannot purchase seriously violent games on their own, and that parents who care about the matter can readily evaluate the games their children bring home. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:51 am
Spencer Stuart Board Index Posted by Julie Hembrock Daum, Laurel McCarthy, and Ann Yerger, Spencer Stuart, on Monday, November 18, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Director qualifications, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Management, Surveys Judicial Deference on Executive Compensation Decisions Posted by David Berger, Lori Will, and Brad Sorrels, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Tuesday,… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:24 am by Michelle Yeary
  Well we have seen the future and it is Sorrell – we fervently hope.Still, we guess it is better than nothing. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am by Bexis
  The main theory that the plaintiffs were able to come up with involved that last-refuge-of-a-scoundrel Restatement section, §324A “Good Samaritan” liability, that would have:  (1) required publishers to investigate the substantive validity of everything they publish (the Philadelphia case involved clinical trials), and (2) would have placed anyone who published anything about a drug, no matter how limited, under a duty to research and publish everything. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
” And then cited a case involving professional financial advisers.The contrast between the Court’s low regard for the speech of physicians and the high regard for commercial speech is striking.In Sorrell vs. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sullivan: advertisers take care of some of that; most brands aren’t interested in coming close to controversial subject matters. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  That’s inaccurate descriptively as a matter of the science of decisionmaking, nor is it normatively sensible. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
’ Or, for example, someone such as Martin Sorrell is brought on, who is well known to have views of the kind that he tends to express very volubly. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s expressive at least in part.Dinwoodie: compare to European concept of advertising function, whatever that is, versus source identifying function.Linford: Sorrell v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
One response would be that, if such speech is fully protected, as the Supreme Court indicated in Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
This guest post is from ReedSmith's Lindsey Harteis, who as always gets all the credit and shoulders all the blame for what follows. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The court went on to say: “Although Vallejos was able to pursue a civil action based upon exceptions to the workers’ compensation statute, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees because the “gross negligence” and “unrelated works” exceptions do not apply as a matter of law, and taking the facts in the light most favorable to Vallejos, he cannot prove that Infinity was grossly negligent or that Lan committed an… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20 (1984), and Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Obviously, in the wake of Citizens United and perhaps more significantly still for business, Sorrell v. [read post]