Search for: "Matter of State of New York v John T." Results 141 - 160 of 1,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 10:37 am by Michael A. Kahn
Moreover, it didn't matter if the dead celebrity's "home" State--such as New York--had rejected a post-mortem right of publicity. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:13 am by David Markus
In earlier decisions, courts have upheld the law.But that was before United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Rothschild reacted by moving the NFTs to a different marketplace, Rarible.[15] In January 2022, the French luxury brand officially sued Rothschild for trademark infringement, dilution, and cybersquatting, filing their complaint in a New York federal court. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:55 am
Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved.Silberzweig is a very interesting case. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The New York Times and Politico petitioned Howell to unseal portions of the grand jury proceedings in October, citing the historic nature of the secret rulings she had issued. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Bonnette v Long Island College Hosp., 3 NY3d 281 (2004); Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 (1984). [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm
With competing proceedings in New York and California, a trip to the Court of Appeal, an OSC from the California Supreme Court, and (today) the latest installment, in which the Court of Appeal reaffirms its prior conclusion notwithstanding the OSC.Needless to say, the dispute isn't over. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
Hillary Clinton (New York) (left):BLITZER: You say national security is more important than human rights. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
In support of this position, Adam Liptak penned an article in Sunday’s New York Times, arguing that the Court led by Chief Justice John Roberts is the most business-friendly since World War II. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]