Search for: "Matter of Williams v City of New York" Results 141 - 160 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am by Lyle Denniston
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents; it involved the forced entry into an apartment in New York City and other misconduct by federal drug officers, who had no warrant. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
Additionally, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office and the New York City Medical Examiner's Office stated if the Court held that Williams' rights were violated, up to 12 individuals would likely be required to testify at each criminal trial in New York that used DNA profiles. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 3:20 pm by Amanda Seligman
Juleyka Lantigua-Williams wrote about the study in The Atlantic, and the New York Times’s “The Upshot” column reported the findings. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:17 am
" [See Stavitz v City of New York, 98 AD2d 529.] ======================= General Municipal Law§§ 207-a and 207-c - a 1098 page e-book focusing on administering General Municipal Law Sections 207-a/207-c and providing benefits thereunder is available from the Public Employment Law Press. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bradford; Morrison v Circuit City Stores, Inc., 317 F3d 646 [6th Cir 2003]; Spinetti v Service Corp. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 2:51 am by Amy Howe
At ACSblog, Victor Williams criticizes Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion in NLRB v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf talks to “DACA recipients working in the health care field in California, Florida, Texas and in the suburbs of New York City, where the coronavirus has hit hardest. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm by Nathan Sheard
However, amid calls to defund the police, many of the bill's detractors, including New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, came to see the measure as appropriate and balanced. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  I will not accept materials that raise new issues and introduce new exhibits that are not relevant to the claims originally raised in the appeal (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeals of Gonzalez, 48 id. 405, Decision No. 15,898). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]