Search for: "Matter of Youngs v Youngs" Results 141 - 160 of 4,226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On August 24, 2023, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of state-law securities claims in Kirschner v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:43 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
When states ban gender-affirming care (GAC) for minors, for instance, they cite Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am by CMS
The Young Lawyers’ Committee (YLC) is constituted by young lawyers, trainees, policy workers, paralegals, and law students with a keen interest in human rights law, who work together to provide essential training and resources for young people considering a career in human rights. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am by INFORRM
. ● Sustainable development and freedom of expression: why voice matters. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Pseudonymity isn't just a matter of civil procedure; it should also matter to people who care about privacy, free speech, public supervision of courts, and more. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:15 pm by Meredith Ervine
”  In City of Fort Lauderdale Police and Firefighters’ Retirement Sys. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:10 pm by Meredith Ervine
Ann notes that this decision was the natural result of Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Alan Neff
It is notable that, as a young DOJ lawyer, Roberts opposed this amendment, which overruled Mobile v. [read post]