Search for: "May v. AC & S, INC."
Results 141 - 160
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Tenants Union, Inc., this Court made clear that only specific restrictions on speech that track the narrow exceptions to the First Amendment may be upheld. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:40 am
Dodelson v AC Holdco, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:20 am
Briefly: At the ACS blog, Brian Stull weighs in on Davila v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Harry Winston, Inc. and Harry Winston S.A. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd (Scotland), heard 29 April 2020 Stoffel & Co v Grondona, heard 5 May 2020 Ecila Henderson (A Protected Party, by her litigation friend, The Official Solicitor) v Dorset Healthcare Trust, heard Monday 11- Tuesday 12 May 2020 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard Wednesday 13- Thursday 14 May 2020 AP v Her… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
Recently, the FTC filed its “Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Pre-Trial Brief and Exhibits” in the Matter of 1-800 Contacts, Inc. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
Motorola Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:06 pm
In fact, the Census Bureau’s chief scientist, who has served in that role since the Obama administration, informed Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross that “[s]ince the question is already asked on the American Community Survey, we would accept the cognitive research and questionnaire testing from the ACS instead of independently retesting the citizenship question. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am
Lanelogic Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm
The court also found that, in promulgating the rule, the OFCCP was justified in not exempting construction contractors (Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Acts of inducement may be inferred from defendant’s pre-issuance conduct: SynQor, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
In the light of this, it considered that Parliament’s choice to use the wording of “serious harm” could only have represented an intentional departure from the previous decisions in Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 74 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
* A Kat's 2014 Copyright AwardsHere’s the much-awaited Eleonora’s 2014 Copyright Awards [the 2013 edition of the eLAW Copryright Oscars may be found here]. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
In Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
” Today’s second argument is in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am
Trust Co. v Flagstar Capital Mkts., 32 NY3d 139, 145-146 [2018]; ACE Sec. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm
The Court could not make an award of “vindicatory” damages, merely to mark the commission of the wrong; this was wrong in principle: see R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245 [97-100]. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am
Honeywell International, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:31 am
Mr Justice Birss' decision on Section 100 Patents Act 1977 may help! [read post]
