Search for: "May v. Justices" Results 141 - 160 of 52,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2016, 2:22 pm by JB
  Note in particular that a Justice's methodological commitments and legal skill may often be less important to later generations than the Justice's substantive commitments.(4) Did the Justice have acolytes and supporters who will defend and promote the Justice's reputation, and launder it for later generations? [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:15 pm by Walter Olson
“was not the only signal that the administration may have difficulty winning in the case of Bond v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
Blackmun uttered in 1987: “Roe against Wade was not such a revolutionary opinion at the time” that it was handed down in January 1973, and in that statement Justice Blackmun was indisputably correct.In early May 1971, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 3:34 am
Author Pumbaa80Licence Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 unportedSource Wikipedia: Portal Association Football  Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mr Justice Nugee) Davies v Wolverhampton Wanderers Football Club (1986) Ltd [2019] EWHC 1252 (Ch) (15 May 2019) This was a claim for infringement of copyright. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Such partial summary judgment may run the risk of duplicative proceedings or inconsistent findings of fact and therefore the use of the powers may not be in the interest of justice. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am by INFORRM
The court may derogate from some or all these open justice principals where there is evidence justifying such a course of action. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:41 am by snahmod
On May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:44 pm
Justices Breyer and Scalia went at it today during oral arguments in Horne v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:28 am by scanner1
O’Connell DA 18-0658 2019 MT 121N Civil – Justice Court Appeal Simpkins v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:53 am by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
There is a free one hour teleseminar on Thursday, May 19, 2011, and again on Friday, May 20, 2011, put on by the Public Justice Foundation, concerning the implications of the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
Justice Stevens’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:04 am by Immigration Prof
United States: "Judge Hanen’s order dated May 19, 2016 reprimanding thousands of Department of Justice lawyers... [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:00 am by CivPro Blogger
Justice Ginsburg’s opinion begins: Section 340B of the Public Health Services Act imposes ceilings on prices drug manufacturers may charge... [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm by INFORRM
  On 13 May 2010 Mr Justice Eady struck out the libel claim in Kaschke v Osler ([2010] EWHC 1075, see our post here). [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:21 am
Wyeth v Levine, heard today at the Supreme Court, may not be about preemption after all according to Dan Slater at the WSJ Law Blog: Indeed, when Justice Kennedy asked Levine's lawyer when preemption should apply, the lawyer said that if the FDA had adequately weighed the risks and benefits of the IV push method, continue… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:31 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Atnold)  Allergan, Inc and another v Aspire Pharma Ltd [2019] EWHC 1085 (Pat) (3 May 2019)  Allergan Inc is the proprietor of European patent EP1753434 for an enhanced bimatoprost ophthalmic solution which its English subsidiary, Allergan Ltd. exploits by marketing a product containing 0.1 mg/ml (0.01%) bimatoprost for ophthalmic [read post]