Search for: "McDonald v. State of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
” In Turner v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:15 am
The case of Peruta v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
The respondents, represented by Alan Gura, the counsel who won the court’s two Second Amendment blockbusters McDonald v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel weighs in on Monday’s argument in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
” (Id. at p. 317; see McDonald v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:41 am
The court granted McDonald’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing the wage and hour lawsuit against the company (Salazar v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:58 am
The court also granted the fast food giant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs’ representative claims under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) (Salazar v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:07 am
[Thaya Brook Knight, Bainbridge, WLF, Ira Stoll; earlier] Five state legislatures (California, Oregon, Illinois, Maryland, and Connecticut) now push private employers to enlist employees in state retirement plans. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 11:06 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 10:49 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed for failure to state a claim. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:46 am
If they could establish an “ostensible agency” relationship—which would require showing, among other things, a reasonable belief McDonalds was their employer—McDonalds could be held jointly liable for the franchisee’s alleged violations of California wage laws (Salazar v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:14 am
Supreme Court case of Bragdon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:27 am
Four individuals who worked as hourly employees at McDonald’s restaurants brought a putative class action alleging they were denied overtime pay and other rights under California labor law at five McDonald’s restaurants in California owned by a particular franchisee. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am
” And some are more audacious than creative, as when a California woman got in trouble after allegedly sending “faked treatment documents and burn photos from a hospital website” to bolster a hot coffee spill claim against McDonald’s. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:25 am
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
The owners complied with the many federal and California regulations pertaining to firearms stores. [read post]
