Search for: "McDonald v. Strong" Results 141 - 160 of 245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2010, 8:34 pm
 Some strong supporters of the right to bear arms (understood post-Heller/McDonald as an individual right)  think that all people who are eligible to carry firearms should carry firearms. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am by Charon QC
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The ABC managing director, David Anderson, has mounted a strong defence of Louise Milligan’s reporting on Christian Porter, saying her journalism was in the public interest and of the “highest quality”. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Patrick Bumatay's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc today in Mai v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:52 am by Arturo Jara
The “V” initially stands out, but upon second glance, the “M” is revealed. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
The respondents, represented by Alan Gura, the counsel who won the court’s two Second Amendment blockbusters McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
” A retired Justice later reported that Justice Scalia included this declaration at the insistence of Justice Anthony Kennedy, without whose vote the case would have been decided differently.In 2010, when the Court invalidated Chicago’s handgun ban in McDonald v. [read post]