Search for: "McDonald v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 12:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
There's one place, though, where Second Amendment originalism does dovetail with some work I've done, and that's with regard to the "Militia Clauses" of Article I, which empower Congress "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions," and "To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to… [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
McDonald, 453 F.3d 958, 962 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
Vernon, Florida, subject of a famous documentary by Errol Morris, is the subject of coverage here (“By the end of the ’50s, the Florida Panhandle was responsible for two-thirds of all loss-of-limb accident claims in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am by Anna Christensen
United States, the Court asked the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in the context of United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:50 am by Jim Lindgren
Among the nice other points of the paper are: (a) Bushrod Washington’s opinion in Corfield v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:58 am by JB
" In hindsight, what Gura should have said is, first, the Supreme Court overrules cases all the time-- just look at Citizens United this term-- (nudge, nudge, Justice Kennedy)-- and, second, that it wasn't really necessary to overrule Slaughter-House.Instead, the Court should overrule United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm by David Oscar Markus
But not at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While courts generally recognize and enforce contractual agreements by a party to consent to jurisdiction, mere registration of an out-of-state business to do business in a state historically has not been recognized as creating the necessary “substantial minimum contacts” that the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution generally requires exist to provide the general personal jurisdiction that must exist for a state court to… [read post]