Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 141 - 160
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[ix] This idea would later become the Space Shuttle, but it would only take shape after NASA solicited designs from aerospace companies like Lockheed, McDonnell Douglas, General Dynamics, and North American Rockwell. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:49 am
McDonnell Douglas, 468 F.Supp. 521 (D.Ariz.1979). [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Where a plaintiff cannot produce direct evidence of an employer's discriminatory intent, the plaintiff may prove his case with circumstantial evidence under the burden-shifting scheme of proof established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
Per the 1973 Supreme Court case McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:32 am
The court allowed plaintiff's race and sexual orientation discrimination claim to go forward: In the absence of direct evidence of discrimination, the Court applies the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:59 am
Freedom Mortgage Corp., August 25, 2017, Rovner, I.). [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:48 am
He was later selected for training to be a first officer on a McDonnell Douglas MD-11 aircraft, a “wide-body” aircraft that would qualify him for a higher pay grade. [read post]
Employer could not rely on incomplete info to assert honest belief employee was uncooperative in IME
3 Dec 2013, 8:21 am
Because this evidence could not require a juror to conclude that the company discriminated against her, it was circumstantial and properly analyzed under the McDonnell Douglas framework, the court concluded. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., supra, 87 Cal.App.3d 626, and Kadelbach v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:49 am
” The employee fared no better under the McDonnell Douglas framework. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:21 pm
The 4 Parts of a Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Case When you pursue a discrimination case under federal law (Title VII,) you have to meet the test created by the Supreme Court‘s decision in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
IBM Corp. did not mandate summary judgment. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
En los casos por discrimen en la jurisdicción federal es aplicable la doctrina que se conoce como el “McDonnell Douglas paradigm”, establecido por el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos en McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Curtiss-Wright Corp., 204 N.J. 239 (N.J. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 5:01 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 191 F.3d 948 (8th Cir. 1999), employees claimed that a workforce reduction, while not disproportionately affecting employees age 40 and older, disproportionately affected employees age 55 and older. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 148 F.3d 347, 351 (4th Cir. 1998). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
