Search for: "Mendez v. Mendez"
Results 141 - 160
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Significantly, the Appellate Division noted the Plaintiff's claim that her initial filing tolled the statute of limitations was unavailing "because the time to commence an Article 78 proceeding is not extended by her eventual pursuit of administrative remedies," citing Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 128 AD3d 584. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
Significantly, the Appellate Division noted the Plaintiff's claim that her initial filing tolled the statute of limitations was unavailing "because the time to commence an Article 78 proceeding is not extended by her eventual pursuit of administrative remedies," citing Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 128 AD3d 584. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:10 am
Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005) and Muehler v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:55 am
In Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612, the Appellate Division held that retaining Mendez on the payroll until the end of payroll period for administrative convenience did not result in his attaining tenure in the position. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
Claims against the parole board chairwoman were dismissed.In Mendez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:00 pm
The decision in Thames v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:19 am
Mendez A recent decision from the Georgia Court of Appeals, Mannion & Mannion, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 5:33 am
") AC36791 - State v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
It perceived no basis for finding that Petitioner's termination "was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, violative of a statute, or done in bad faith," citing Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 28 NY3d 993;2. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
State v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 pm
Mendez-Santana, 2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
See also Mendez Lynch v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:57 am
" The Court stated that it agreed with the petitioner's legal position, but lacked jurisdction under its prior precedents.The decision in Mendez v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 12:25 pm
The sun may be disappearing (temporarily, anyway). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:13 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:58 am
In Los Angeles County v. [read post]
