Search for: "Michael Koh"
Results 141 - 160
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2020, 10:43 pm
In a recent post on the Harvard Corporate Governance Blog, “Bernie Ebbers and Board Oversight of the Office of Legal Affairs,” Michael W. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Cerreta then clerked for Judge Michael Chagares — who is, by the way, a great guy. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
And Ritika flagged the recent announcement that Vice Admiral Michael Rogers, a cryptologist, will succeed Gen. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
” Frank Chi makes a case for Harold Koh as “someone that progressives would be proud to fight for. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:37 am
This hearing particularly offers a useful commentary on Department of State Legal Adviser Harold Koh’s March 25, 2010 speech that included an important section defending drone warfare and emphasizing the concept of self-defense as an independent ground for the use of force outside of either law enforcement or armed conflict. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
Add to that written submissions by Michael Lewis on the armed conflict view, and the ACLU’s view of limits to geography and, in its view, the application else where of international human rights law, and one can see that the view of the legal situation is much more nuanced and complex than sometimes thought. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:23 am
The empire now includes locations in Cabo San Lucas, Marrakech, Marbella, Koh Samui , New York, Panama, St. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
As the improbable but credible team of Harold Koh and John Yoo correctly put it almost three decades ago, presidents “have declared national emergencies with little regard to whether a real emergency has actually existed. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:37 am
Koh was entirely serious when he talked in 2010 about legal reviews inside, and particularly as Title 10 and Title 50 operations, personnel, and so on converge, so too legal reviews and standards. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
Michael Seidman, Professor, Georgetown University Law Center William S. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Our government, in speeches given by the Attorney General,[2] John Brennan,[3] Harold Koh,[4] and myself,[5] makes official disclosures of large amounts of information about its efforts, and the legal basis for those efforts, but it is never enough, because the public doesn’t know what it doesn’t know, but knows there are things their government is still withholding from them. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 6:49 am
AUTHOR Perry, Michael J. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Design Patents Have Come - http://bit.ly/RjToW4 (Lisa Shuchman) iWin: Apple Defeats Samsung in Key Pre-Trial Motion - http://bit.ly/OzXID3 (Michael Pontrelli) Fighting Over Rectangles: Why Apple Can't Win The Patent War - http://bit.ly/OBA32j (Skylar Greene) Apple, Samsung, Dance the Courtroom Jig - Lucy Koh Hears Evidence on the Origin of the Oblong - http://bit.ly/OD3uDR (Tamlin Magee) In Apple-Samsung trial, it's John Quinn v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
In a euphoric mood, high-profile observers like Michael Ignatieff believed that secure moral guidance, born of incontestable shock about the Holocaust, was on the verge of displacing self-interest and power as the foundation of international relations. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
Case Western Reserve University; PhD Public Policy and Administration (candidate), Pennsylvania State University; Visiting Assistant Professor of Law Pennsylvania State University; National Security Law, Criminal Law Michael A. [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:05 am
I do not believe that is true - nor does Harold Koh believe it is true. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:42 pm
I do not believe that is true — nor does Harold Koh appear to believe it is true, on the basis of his remarks at ASIL. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump said he was listing the reimbursements to Michael Cohen “in the interest of transparency,” even though he was not required to disclose them. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
By Haiyun Damon-Feng* One of the cruelest and most devastating Trump-era immigration policies was the Remain in Mexico policy, formally titled the “Migrant Protection Protocols” (MPP).[1] MPP upended decades of established asylum law and practice, forcing asylum seekers to wait in Mexico pursuant to a bilateral agreement between the U.S. and Mexico—where many were kidnapped, raped, tortured, or otherwise exploited or killed for their vulnerability as migrants—while they… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:12 am
Michael Schmitt has recently argued that he clearly was, but the United States has yet to clearly make the case. [read post]
