Search for: "Mike Framer"
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2010, 7:11 am
The framers of our Constitution understood the unique and indispensable role of pardon when they entrusted the president with an unreviewable power to override the law. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
" You go, Mike! [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:59 pm
See also, the interview by General Electric's Mike McIlwrath in July 2009 of Prof. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 9:59 pm
See also, the interview of General Electric's Mike McIlwrath in July 2009 of Prof. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:59 pm
See also, the interview of General Electric's Mike McIlwrath in July 2009 of Prof. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
I could, however, point readers to this recent and fascinating article in the Cornell Law Review arguing that the Framers WERE very much concerned about combating corruption. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 5:11 am
Newt Gingrich and Mike Huckabee have been busy lately. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
In 1890, Mike "King" Kelly, was the manager of the Boston Reds. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:09 pm
The imposition of such a limitation upon the nurses' ability to freely exercise their right to resign from the service of an employer who allegedly failed to fulfill the promises and commitments made to them is the antithesis of the free and voluntary system of labor envisioned by the framers of the Thirteenth Amendment. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:51 pm
Mike Dorning at The Swamp blog quotes Emanuel's recent comments on the House floor about LaHood: If you look back and I think if you ask all our colleagues, somebody when our framers thought of a member of Congress what they had in their mind's eye, that person would be Ray LaHood, whose decency, his sense of what it is that he was doing here on behalf of who he was doing it for never changed in his 30 years. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
Mike Dorning at The Swamp blog quotes Emanue's recent comments on the House floor about LaHood: If you look back and I think if you ask all our colleagues, somebody when our framers thought of a member of Congress what they had in their mind's eye, that person would be Ray LaHood, whose decency, his sense of what it is that he was doing here on behalf of who he was doing it for never changed in his 30 years. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 11:17 am
MADIGAN: Oh, I'm sorry.Q (Off mike) -- abusing the AG authority.MS. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:06 pm
Thus, as my OCU colleague Mike O'Shea has observed on Concurring Opinions (in his edifying play-by-play analysis of the Heller case) the Court had little trouble concluding that the Second Amendment had "[p]rimarily private purposes. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 1:22 am
Or at least they're supposed to.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:21 pm
The framers are worthy models in many senses. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:57 am
As Akhil Amar and Mike Curtis have pointed out, once you adopt the Sixteenth Amendment, which presupposes the power of the federal government to engage in progressive income taxation, you need to rethink what the class legislation principle means in the modern administrative and welfare state. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:53 am
The anthology features our essayists' response to this challenge: When the Framers met in Philadelphia in 1787, they bravely conjured a new form of self-government. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 am
Mike O'Shea has thoughts on tomorrow's argument in D.C. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:50 am
In this regard, we argue, originalism is a jurisprudential theory with its own living constitutionalism.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:21 am
For though my position is straight talk, it's not exactly originalism.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
