Search for: "Miller v. Board of Education"
Results 141 - 160
of 272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Happersett (the 1875 case holding that the Fourteenth Amendment did not afford women the right to vote), and Miller v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:10 am
PubMed PMID: 33541252.Shah SK, Miller FG, Darton TC, Duenas D, Emerson C, Lynch HF, Jamrozik E, Jecker NS, Kamuya D, Kapulu M, Kimmelman J, MacKay D, Memoli MJ, Murphy SC, Palacios R, Richie TL, Roestenberg M, Saxena A, Saylor K, Selgelid MJ, Vaswani V, Rid A. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:57 am
Secretary of Education. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:58 am
Board of Education. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Aaron David Miller will moderate the discussion. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:59 am
V. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
Jensen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
Detroit Board of Education. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
In American Insurance Association v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
McCann v The State Hospital Board for Scotland (Scotland), heard 11-12 October 2016. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
See Board of Airport Comm’rs of City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Florida and Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The Supreme Court distinguished Miller because the supervisor in that case used her notes to prepare memos that were sent directly to the Board of Education so that it could make a determination regarding Miller’s employment. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm
Observing that categorical exemptions, as exceptions to CEQA, are “narrowly construed” and “not to be expanded beyond the reasonable scope of their statutory language” (quoting San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates For Responsible Education v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Louisiana 14-280Issue: Whether Miller v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:10 am
The resulting class action, Handschu v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding… [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:00 am
On March 20th the US Supreme Court heard arguments in Miller v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 8:37 am
Board of Supervisors (1969) 1 Cal.App.3d 13, 19.) [read post]
