Search for: "Miller v. District Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Rio Tinto provided much needed clarity for district courts within the Second Circuit. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm
On February 27, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division One) filed its published decision in Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York recently held that, as a matter of first impression, the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA) does not invalidate a binding arbitration agreement if the plaintiff fails to plead a plausible sexual harassment claim. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
” In concluding that Section 533 precludes coverage for the malicious prosecution claim against the law firm, the appellate court relied heavily on Downey Venture v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
Oct. 3, 2016) (dismissing antitrust challenge to merger of Anheuser-Busch InBev and SAB Miller), aff’d sub nom. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:35 am
Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
(Citing and discussing at length, Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd District Agricultural Association (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929, and Ventura Foothill Neighbors v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
In the build up to the preliminary hearing, the defendants applied to the District Court for the Southern District of New York (the DCSDNY) on 6 December 2022 for an order requiring HSBC Bank USA NA (HSBC USA) to produce two very broad categories of banking documents relating to Mr Soriano’s companies in reliance on 28 USC §1782 (the 1782 application). [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
” In Miller v Pate, the Supreme Court wrote, “In argument at the close of the habeas corpus hearing, counsel for the State contended that ‘[e]verybody’ at the trial had known that the shorts were stained with paint. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:09 am
by Jeffrey Lefstin Not too long after the Supreme Court decided Mayo v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
A recent Miller Act payment bond decision out of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. f/u/b/o Civil Construction, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:47 pm
Here, the court (in my view) mis-cited ChargePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 6:57 pm
Industries v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:51 am
In Metra Industries Inc. v. [read post]