Search for: "Miller v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 671
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit erred under Miller-El v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am by SHG
Miller, a pedestrian decision relating to information everyone knew was in the hands of third parties, rather than the outcome-dependent decision in Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Miller, Mayer Brown LLP, on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Audits, Disclosure, Insurance, Liability standards Providing Retail Investors a Voice in the Proxy Process Posted by J.W. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:12 am by John Floyd
In 2013, the Supreme Court let stand a 10-2 Louisiana jury verdict in the case of Miller v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-5232, Smith v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:57 am by Nathaniel Sobel
We do not disturb the application of Smith and Miller or call into question conventional surveillance techniques and tools, such as security cameras. [read post]