Search for: "Mineral and Royalty Owners" Results 141 - 160 of 349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
That in turn means more royalty payments and higher income to Texas mineral owners and royalty owners. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:09 am by Charles Sartain
The typical way these errors are discovered in the real life of a producer is by an aggrieved royalty owner after you’ve overpaid somebody else. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:35 pm by J. Mark Robinette
  In two of these dockets, the heirs of a long deaceased mineral owner made some novel arguments to the Commission about the remedy due them for being missed in an integration application, and in the other docket, the same heirs contested whether the operator exercised reasonable efforts to find the long dead mineral owner's heirs. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm by Patti Spencer
Severability In Pennsylvania, gas and other mineral rights are completely severable from the surface rights. [read post]
  In Van Dyke, the Court reasoned that because mineral owners so commonly assumed that a one-eighth royalty would be reserved in all future leases, that one-eighth was used, at least in some instances, as a term of art for future royalties generally. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:45 am by John McFarland
Mineral owners should learn how to use those search capabilities. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:24 am
I got the idea for starting this blog from a presentation I made at a meeting of the Texas Land & Mineral Owners' Association, titled "Checklist for Negotiating an Oil and Gas Lease. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:19 am by John McFarland
  Often, the royalty owner’s receipt of a division order is the first indication to the royalty owner that a well has been completed and is producing. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:29 am
While the mineral owner retains a reversionary interest, an oil and gas lease is actually a sale. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm by Nena Eddy and Denice Redd-Robinette
R.S. 31:210 has only been applied to wholly distinguishable situations involving third-party purchasers of minerals from a recorded lease, previously granted by the “last record owner,” who were unaware of the existence of a title dispute. [read post]
The lessors and royalty owners of certain mineral leases in the Cameron Parish, brought an action against the defendants in the Thirty-Eighth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Cameron. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:01 pm by Alan Ackerman
Forced pooling has been allowed in many jurisdictions in order to increase mineral production. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
On March 4, 1993, the Harts executed a cash sale deed transferring an undivided 3/4 interest in a 707 acre tract to Flat River Farms, LLC (“Flat River”).[15] Under the agreement, Flat River became the surface owner but the Harts retained ownership of the minerals via the mineral servitude created by the transaction.[16] In the following years, Flat River and Larry Lott of Lott Company, LLC (collectively “Lott”) granted warranty easements to the U.S.… [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
On March 4, 1993, the Harts executed a cash sale deed transferring an undivided 3/4 interest in a 707 acre tract to Flat River Farms, LLC (“Flat River”).[15] Under the agreement, Flat River became the surface owner but the Harts retained ownership of the minerals via the mineral servitude created by the transaction.[16] In the following years, Flat River and Larry Lott of Lott Company, LLC (collectively “Lott”) granted warranty easements to the U.S.… [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
On March 4, 1993, the Harts executed a cash sale deed transferring an undivided 3/4 interest in a 707 acre tract to Flat River Farms, LLC (“Flat River”).[15] Under the agreement, Flat River became the surface owner but the Harts retained ownership of the minerals via the mineral servitude created by the transaction.[16] In the following years, Flat River and Larry Lott of Lott Company, LLC (collectively “Lott”) granted warranty easements to the U.S.… [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 11:20 am by John McFarland
Whenever the right to lease is separated from the mineral or royalty interest, the holder of the leasing right is called the holder of the "executive right," and the other mineral or royalty owner without any leasing right is called the owner of the "non-executive" interest. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:41 pm by Barry Barnett
They also indicate a potentially large upside for the mineral owner, who without the existing lease could enter into a more favorable one or develop the minerals herself. [read post]