Search for: "Mitchell v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm
Mitchell: The Court affirmed Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:39 pm
That judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal (Morales v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:31 am
Superior Court, 705 P.2d 347 (Cal. 1985)(invalidating a contingent fee arrangement in a public nuisance case) with San Francisco v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Unlike many legal commentators that have criticized the European Courts, we conclude that the approach of the Courts is justified both from a purely legal standpoint and from a Law and Economics perspective. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Superior Court (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 272, 288. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:59 am
Superior Court (1988) 200 Cal. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 3:44 pm
The simple argument was that superior courts of record could not be subject to judicial review, because they couldn't be. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Montgomery County v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 5:39 pm
In Wells Fargo Funding v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 2:36 pm
Relying upon Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am
The Superior Court, King County, 2006 WL 3193619,Michael C. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 4:37 am
Call Mitchell A. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
"Mitchell H. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:58 pm
In State v. [read post]
