Search for: "Mobil Oil Corp., Appeal of" Results 141 - 160 of 186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
In a class certification appeal, the Court speaks to the UCC's good-faith requirement Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:40 pm by Joe Koncelik
It is important to note that another federal district court (Northern District of California) in the case of Native Village of Kivalina v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am by Susan Brenner
Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 115 (1989): `A 'fraud on the court' occurs where it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system's ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party's claim or defense.' Rockdale Mgmt. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:38 pm
Exxon Mobil Corp. and its oil tanker subsidiary notified lawyers for fishermen and others harmed by the massive Alaska oil spill 20 years ago that on Wednesday it will pay them $470,268,908, but returned to a federal court to continue a fight over another $54.5 million. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
(IPKat) ECJ: Distinctive character must be acquired through use of trade mark before date of application: Imagination Technologies Ltd v OHIM (IPKat) (Class 46) EPO appeal ‘invalid for insufficiency’: Pipe for filling bottles/Gallardo Gonzales (PatLit) Prevent patents inhibiting knowledge diffusion for green technology, EU told (Intellectual Property Watch) IPREG to regulate IP professionals (IPKat) Tricky European patent question: what happens when international… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:52 am
  That represents more than 12 years of interest; Exxon Mobil Corp. had fought to limit the interest to less than a year’s worth. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:51 pm
Hartmann, 08-500). ** With Justice Alito not taking part, the Court refused to hear an appeal by Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (federal respondents) Brief in opposition (Alabama and Florida) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-212 Title: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP)   Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46)   Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46)   United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office)   United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]