Search for: "Mosley v. Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Max Mosley, the former FIA boss and subject of a News of the World expose, put forward his views on prior notification and the private lives of those in the public eye. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
” – Brian Cathcart Privacy, the Duchess of York and the Public Interest MBL/Inforrm Conference Paper: “Defamation – Common Law Development or Statutory Codification” – Desmond Browne QC Case Law: Zac Goldsmith and others v BCD – privacy injunctions and return dates – Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Comment: Sawant v Times Global Broadcasting Limited – an extraordinary award of compensatory damages by an Indian court Opinion:… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The French Court where he was a defendant to a claim brought by Max Mosley,  the Employment Tribunal where he was a claimant in a claim against News Group Newspapers and the Leveson Inquiry 11. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Max Mosley went to the European Court of Human Rights with his application against the United Kingdom. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  That is how it was put, only six months ago, in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (App No 48009/08), 10 May 2011. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
Does television hold the key to better press regulation? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am by royblack
There are a thousand thoughts lying within a man that he does not know till he takes up a pen to write. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:59 am by INFORRM
This is a tactic that was exposed in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB): the figure offered by News of the World to ‘Woman E‘ was £25,000 but she only received £12,000 after she delivered the video material. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
Hakim does not add to the latter list, the court specifically noting that an identification from a showup conducted within a very short time after the crime is much more likely to be valid… In State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am by Melina Padron
Mosley loses The ECtHR’s has rejected Max Mosley’s request to refer his case against the UK to the Grand Chamber. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Ferdinand v Mgn Ltd (Rev 2) [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) – Read judgment In the first “misuse of private information” trial against a newspaper since Max Mosley in 2008, Mr Justice Nicol dismissed a claim brough by England and Manchester United footballer Rio Ferdinand against the “Sunday Mirror”. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgment was handed down today in the case of Ferdinand v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  It noted that the only exception to the trend of modest damages was Mosley v. [read post]