Search for: "Motion Picture Licensing Corporation"
Results 141 - 160
of 189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
My guess is that neither Michael nor Toby obtained a license that would allow the right to “synchronize” the song with the video. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
Licensing Assocs., Inc., 119 F.3d 55, 59 (1st Cir. 1997), quoting 17 U.S.C. ? [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
No. 98-894, at 6 (1984), reprinted in 1984 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3689, 3695 (“For example, the motion picture ‘War Games’ showed a realistic representation of the automatic dialing and access capabilities of the personal computer. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Sheppard Mullin pending before the CAFC (Patently-O) (Patents Post Grant Blog) Nike – Motion to transfer venue granted: Factors favored transfer & plaintiff’s location ‘recent, ephemeral’: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:20 pm
Supreme Court and a number of Circuits, on behalf of organizations including the AIPLA, the Motion Picture Association of America, the New York City Bar Association, and the Recording Industry Association of America. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Kedge Holding (EPLAW) Infringement of medical device: AGA Medical Corporation v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
These two elements are so similar to the look and feel of Marvel's Hulk (picture, left) that your average power tool consumer will think that Marvel licensed the use of their Hulk rights to Airbase. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
The doctrine of patent misuse has its origins in a series of Supreme Court cases, beginning with the 1917 decision in Motion Picture Patents Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:41 pm
This is the first big star motion picture that I am aware of that addresses AIDS discrimination. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm
“Perform” is defined as: “to recite, render, play, dance, or act [a work], either directly or by means of any device or process or, in the case of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to show its images in any sequence or to make the sounds accompanying it audible. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(Maier & Maier) (IP Law Blog) Pacific Pictures Corporation – Superman: the never ending lawsuit: DC Comics v Pacific Pictures Corporation et al (Trademark Blog) Taflove – District Court N D Illinois will not amend summary judgement based upon ‘new’ evidence: Ho v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:22 pm
A not-for-profit corporation foundedin 1953, the Society works to advance the study and understanding ofcopyright law and related rights, the scope of rights in literature, music,art, theater, motion picture, television, computer software, architecture,and other works of authorship, and their distribution via both traditionaland new media.The Copyright Society of the USA352 Seventh Avenue Suite 739New York NY 10001P: 212 354-6401F: 212-354-2847W: www.csusa.orgE:… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Defendant also claimed that Plaintiff did not have any license from Defendant to use the Wild Dunes Service Mark in his photograph, but he distributed the photograph for over a year as part of a package of pictures. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:18 pm
Allcare is a Virginia corporation but with its principal place of business in Fort Worth, Texas. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Research in Motion, Ltd. et al. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
Wilson,343 U.S. 495 (1952), that a law prohibiting the showing of movies deemed to be "sacrilegious" violated the First Amendment rights of the Appellant who was "a corporation engaged in the business of distributing motion pictures. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:25 am
Research In Motion Limited v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:54 am
He obtained a number of multi-million dollar trial court awards, including an $80 million jury verdict, which is the largest ever obtained against a motion picture studio. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:18 am
Wise was a criminal case where Wise was accused of "willfully and for profit vending copyright feature-length motion pictures" which he had purchased from certain licensees. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
This is the first big star motion picture that I am aware of that addresses AIDS discrimination. [read post]
