Search for: "Mr. Kumar" Results 141 - 160 of 185
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2011, 2:22 pm by The Legal Blog
" (iv) Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and Others v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:46 pm by Frank Pasquale
” “At some point, what I worry about is that there can be this massive implosion in him,” Kumar adds, to which Rajaratnam responds: “He didn’t seem comfortable. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:47 pm by Frank Pasquale
”“At some point, what I worry about is that there can be this massive implosion in him,” Kumar adds, to which Rajaratnam responds: “He didn’t seem comfortable. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In another non-ironic piece, the Sun accused Mr Mosley of paying a private detective to search for evidence in the course of that case. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
Anil Kumar Gupta on the cross pollination of innovation and its promotion (Spicy IP) ICANN renders ‘domain tasting’ unpalatable (Spicy IP)   United Kingdom Drinks giant Diageo and Sainsbury's have reached agreement in their dispute  (IPKat) (IPKat)   Patent litigation costs and SMEs a judge speaks (PatLit)  (PatLit)   United States US General US Industry Campaign: IP needed to address climate change, economy… [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:40 am by SHG
In coordination with my office and MOCS, Mr. [read post]
It’s not every day that the world is given a modern, real-life example of exemplary leadership, and so, we asked business leaders and experts to remark on what lessons American leaders in business—or really any field—can take from Mr. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:23 am by Sanjana Hattotuwa
Kumar David, an electrical engineer by training and regular political columnist in traditional print media. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
No, says the Supreme Court of India in Sri Kumar Padma Prasad v Union of India : (1992) 2 SCC 428, an important case concerning the validity of appointment of a certain Mr Srivastava to the Gauhati High Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
Dharmendra Kumar – which held that the Right to Information Act, 2005 does not apply to those documents which can be accessed under existing legislation and rules. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Union of India [2005 (6) SCC 344], Ashok Kumar Mittal Vs. [read post]