Search for: "Municipal Services Corp. v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
In CTS Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly prepared the 5,828-page project level EIR, defining the project as a project-level EIR for the proposed resource management plan and conservation plan project components. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:58 pm
See, Hillcrest Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Theater Corp. v. [read post]
Come One Come All: Court Upholds New Jersey’s Ban On Job Advertisements Requiring Current Employment
21 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court’s test for content-based restrictions on commercial speech set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
It states that these systems have been utilized in municipal, fire-rescue, construction, healthcare, mining, farming and other applications. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
The WHARTON CAPITAL registration has been incontestable for a decade now, so I suspect Wharton Advisors Corp may argue that this registration and the associated use of the Wharton Capital name and mark has a necessarily narrowing effect on the University of Pennsylvania’s scope of rights in WHARTON, at least when it comes to being able to reach those who provide financial services, as opposed to educational services. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:49 am
Volkman, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:05 pm
Counsel responded that it would not pursuant to the Court's own precedent in Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
The WHARTON CAPITAL registration has been incontestable for a decade now, so I suspect Wharton Advisors Corp may argue that this registration and the associated use of the Wharton Capital name and mark has a necessarily narrowing effect on the University of Pennsylvania’s scope of rights in WHARTON, at least when it comes to being able to reach those who provide financial services, as opposed to educational services. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 6:58 am
Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:59 am
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
Sewer Services in Quebec In November 2011, the Bureau announced it launched an investigation into bid-rigging (under section 47 of the Act) for municipal and provincial specialized sewer services contracts in the greater Montreal region. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Bond now unseats Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
