Search for: "Murphy v. Light"
Results 141 - 160
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Gobitis, Justice Murphy regretted his decision and instructed his law clerk to look for an opportunity to overrule it. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm
As but one example of the concerns to which I refer, Ceci and Bruck, presenting the Amicus Brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
They held that such a prohibition cannot be justified either in light of the objective of protecting intellectual property rights or by the objective of encouraging the public to attend football stadiums.Judgment in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
In the case coming to the Supreme Court, Young v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:05 am
Case Name: Hannifan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm
JUDGE MURPHY’S DISSENT IN CALCUTT v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 12:28 pm
From Reighard v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:36 am
The DOL apparently agreed, stating, “In light of the position adopted by the Acting Solicitor General in NLRB v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am
Wetch, requiring a lower court to reconsider a challenge to North Dakota’s mandatory bar dues in light of last term’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:17 am
Updated at 6:51 p.m.: The Court also granted discretionary review with oral argument in Anne Elizabeth Murphy v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am
” For The New York Times, Melina Delcik offers an inside look at how the Times covered this term’s sports-betting case, Murphy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
This case is on appeal from the district court's resentencing of Joseph Story in light of United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Murphy, arose from New Jersey. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
"Specification 3 alleged that on or about and between April 23, 1998, and December 17, 1998, Wolfe testified falsely while under oath during an official court proceeding, in violation of Penal Law §210.15.The Appellate Division explained that “It is well settled that the principles of due process applicable to criminal trials apply to government administrative proceedings, citing Matter of Murray v Murphy, 24 NY2d 150” and that the requirements of due process… [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:20 am
The panel of eight judges in Comer v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
Habitual drunkenness for the space of two years In Murphy v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Randolph Institute, Breyer’s dissent in Husted, and Alito’s majority opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:10 am
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:47 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:47 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
