Search for: "Murray v State" Results 141 - 160 of 1,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Sara Murray, Kristen Holmes, and Gabby Orr report for CNN. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Secretary of state for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Michelle Donelan welcomed President Biden’s executive order implementing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
She recalls Pauli Murray, the unknown yet brilliant lawyer whose paper on the Civil War amendments helped other lawyers litigate Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm by Kevin
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the “seas” referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray’s Lessee v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the "seas" referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray's Lessee v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the “seas” referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray’s Lessee v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 11 August 2022, the Court of Appeal (Arnold LJ, Dingemans LJ and Warby LJ) gave judgment in Riley v Murray [2022] EWCA Civ 1146. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Glenn Cohen, Melissa Murray & Lawrence O. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Ilya Somin
  (The rule takes its name from Chief Justice Marshall's decision in Murray v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:40 am by John Jascob
Because the district court declined to instruct the jury as to retaliatory intent, the appeals court vacated the verdict in favor of the whistleblower and remanded for a new trial (Murray v. [read post]