Search for: "Myers v. Good" Results 141 - 160 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2018, 7:06 am
  The court was also not persuaded by URS's argument that the BOA applied only to the pricing of goods and services because the Contract unambiguously and unqualifiedly stated that the BOA was incorporated into the Contract. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:43 am by Sara Parrello
Indeed, both Upjohn and before Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova (joined Cases C-427/93, 429/93 and 436/93) had indicated that “the requirement of artificial partitioning of the markets does not imply that the importer must demonstrate (emphasis added) that, by putting an identical product on the market in varying forms of packaging in different Member States, the trade mark proprietor deliberately sought to partition the markets between Member… [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:16 am by Julius Stobbs
These principles were all recently explored again in the CJEU case of Junek Europ-Vertrieb v Lohmann & Rauscher International Case C-642/16. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm by George Conway
The Supreme Court has never squarely addressed the point under the Appointments Clause, but in discussing presidential removal power in Myers v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm by Josh Blackman
I’d be willing to wager that a sizeable majority would have said that Humphrey’s Executor was wrong, and that we should go back to the rule in Myers v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
” For an example, Jackson cited the president’s “exclusive power of removal in executive agencies” that was upheld in Myers v. [read post]