Search for: "NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER V US"
Results 141 - 160
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Public Agencies Opposed to Soc. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Chambers in 1983 that the use of a chaplain to start the day in the Nebraska state legislature did not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
Carhart, for example, the court – in an opinion by Breyer – struck down a Nebraska law that banned so-called “partial birth” abortions, while in Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
However, many voters (in this election especially, but also in previous ones) are using the ballot collection practice to turn in their ballots. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:13 am
Or, they could hold simply that the 1983 Marsh v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
It holds that the discoverable public meaning of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:14 am
It’s a balance between protecting the public and keeping people safe from bad things and making sure that law enforcement doesn’t use its power to violate someone’s protected privacy rights. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
Nebraska earlier this year. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
Nebraska, invalidating the Education Department’s targeted loan forgiveness program. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Nebraska, the Supreme Court student loan forgiveness case, taking what I suspect is a unique position among any of the public filings. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 2:46 pm
Nebraska (1923) and Pierce v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This one gets less play than the others – perhaps because of how courts sometimes use “communication” to get around it in non-prescription medical product cases (more on that to come), or sometimes because plaintiffs might use the same testimony to claim medical malpractice.But prescriber failure to read can be a powerful tool. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Our public squares are monitored by metal detectors and other security devices. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
., v. [read post]
