Search for: "NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO." Results 141 - 160 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
  “General” jurisdiction is why a drug manufacturer based in say, New Jersey, can be sued in New Jersey by a plaintiff from Montana who was prescribed the defendant’s drug by a Montana physician, and who has never set foot in New Jersey. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Corp., 277 F.3d 415 (3d Cir. 2002), the Third Circuit twice refused to recognize public nuisance in product liability actions, first under New Jersey and then under Pennsylvania law. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Simplicity Manufacturing, 563 F.3d 38, 57 (3d Cir. 2009). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Announces Settlement of Actions to Enforce Payment Obligations for Cleanup of New Jersey Superfund Site. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:23 am by Morgan Adams
Off the top of my head I can think of several New Jersey Lawyers (that also practice in New York if need be) that fit the bill. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm by David Walk
The court had to decide which state’s consumer protection law applied – Iowa, where the plaintiffs lived, or New Jersey, which had no relevant contacts other than that one defendant had one division based in New Jersey. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
Lois Capps, Santa Barbara Mayor Helene Schneider and other political leaders, the Environmental Defense Center publicly released an amended agreement with the Texas-based Plains Exploration & Development Co. that gives the blessing of local environmental groups to the oil company’s plan to drill new wells into state [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:06 am
A recent New Jersey case is instructive. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm by Law Lady
Bard is a New Jersey corporation.Medical Malpractice: DOCTORS DIAGNOSED STROKE AS THYROID DISORDER, SUIT SAYS, Talavera v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]