Search for: "NICHOLAS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL" Results 141 - 160 of 374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Nicholas Stephanopoulos maintains that an amicus brief filed by Wisconsin in Benisek v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
  Nicholas Krob is an Intellectual Property Attorney at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am by Robert Manchel
Generally, only the debtors and their attorneys appear at the hearing. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Garrett Hinck
Elena Chachko discussed the extraordinary position of the Israeli Attorney General on Israel’s settlement regularization law. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Weintraub v Petervary  2017 NY Slip Op 51595(U)  Decided on November 16, 2017 Appellate Term, Second Department is an example of how lower courts over-determine cases in favor of the attorney and to the detriment of the client. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
On Tuesday, Shannon Togawa Mercer liveblogged Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Shannon Togawa Mercer live blogged Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
  As the Australian Electronic Commerce Expert Group stated in its 1998 Report to the Attorney-General[2]:“There is always the temptation, in dealing with the law as it relates to unfamiliar and new technologies to set the standards required of a new technology higher than those which currently apply to paper and to overlook the weaknesses that we know to inhere in the familiar. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:27 am by Graham Smith
  As the Australian Electronic Commerce Expert Group stated in its 1998 Report to the Attorney-General[2]:“There is always the temptation, in dealing with the law as it relates to unfamiliar and new technologies to set the standards required of a new technology higher than those which currently apply to paper and to overlook the weaknesses that we know to inhere in the familiar. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am by Garrett Hinck
Matt Tait argued that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s speech about the “Going Dark” debate over-simplified the policy debates on encryption. [read post]