Search for: "NO PARTY v. NO PARTY" Results 141 - 160 of 119,673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 9:54 am by Herb Silber, Q.C.
Communications on an ex parte basis of a strictly procedural nature may be permissible but anything beyond that is perilous. ________________________________________1 Hunt v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:43 am
COMMERCIAL UMBRELLA – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT – NECESSARY PARTIES – PRIVITY OF CONTRACT Brother Jimmy's BBQ, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is one of those cases that seems to be an extreme outlier, but then again see United We Stand America v. [read post]