Search for: "NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY" Results 141 - 144 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
HolderDocket: 09-1211Issue(s): (1) Whether Section 304(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act is inapplicable to pre-enactment convictions of all immigrants whose convictions predate IIRIRA’s enactment, or whether the section’s retroactivity instead (a) turns on an immigrant’s subjective reliance; (b) turns on objectively reasonable reliance; or (c) is categorically inapplicable to convictions obtained at trial; and (2) whether the presumption against… [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
  Enforcement Gap for Actions against Defendants Domiciled within the EU To assess the enforcement gap, it is useful to distinguish EU companies from non-EU companies as defendants. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
., 890 S.W.2d 425, 433 (Tenn. 1994), we held that the defendant doctor, pharmacy, and pharmaceutical company had no duty to a third party plaintiff to warn of the risk to others from the patient’s medication because it was not foreseeable that the third party would mistake the medication for aspirin. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
Under EPCRA regulations, companies of certain size are required to submit their annual reports to EPA and state authorities by listing the amounts of regulated chemicals that their facilities release into the environment through routine activities or as a result of accidents. [read post]