Search for: "NORRIS v. NORRIS" Results 141 - 160 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming dismissal of their claims, the Sixth Circuit determined that they could not sue the union for violation of the LMRA since the criminal statute did not create a private right of action, and the union did not breach its duty of fair representation since it did not act arbitrarily or in bad faith (Ohlendorf v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am by Wolfgang Demino
 16-0854Case Style: HIAWATHA HENRY, ADDIE HARRIS, MONTRAY NORRIS, AND ROOSEVELT COLEMAN, JR., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 CASE STYLE AND LINK TO TEXAS SUPREME COURT DOCKET 16-0854HIAWATHA HENRY, ADDIE HARRIS, MONTRAY NORRIS, AND ROOSEVELT COLEMAN, JR. [read post]
8 May 2017, 9:06 am by ALEX BAILIN QC MATRIX
Lord Kerr, dissenting on that aspect, pointed to decisions such as Zenati v MPC [2015] QB 758 (in which a dilatory decision to discontinue a false passport prosecution engaged Article 5 rights) and Norris v USA #2 [2010] 2 AC 487 (obiter dicta concerning the applicability of art 8 regarding detention for the purpose of prosecution). [read post]