Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 141 - 160 of 1,800
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm by Guest Author
Later this year, the Court will hear oral argument in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Holly Brezee
USPTO marks protect specific goods or services throughout the entire United States and its territories. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Chamber of Commerce amicus brief in the case): National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am by Matthew Dochnal
The Chancellor further referenced a 1989 case, Harco National Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
Netflix streams Rick and Morty and Star Trek: Discovery in the United Kingdom but not in the United States because its licensing contract requires such geographical differentiation to confirm with underlying copyright law.[11] For similar reasons, Amazon requires publishers of e-books to specify the countries where they own publishing rights, and it allows sales only to those countries.[12] Google likewise removes certain pages from its search results when ordered to do so… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Because policy preferences differ across states, regulating at the state level can in the aggregate satisfy more individual preferences than a uniform national law.[3] And federalism also lets states serve as "laboratories" that can experiment with various options, and show the way for other states (and perhaps for an eventual national rule).[4] A uniform national law is sometimes appropriate to implement important… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
It claims to process over 250 million devices per month within the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]