Search for: "Neil Siegel"
Results 141 - 160
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
A version of these will appear in the 2012 Supplement to Brest, Levinson, Balkin, Amar and Siegel, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (5th edition). [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
”)This reliance on animus in the sexual orientation cases may represent, as Neil Siegel has used the term in other contexts, a “way station” to application of traditional equal protection doctrines (suspect classification analysis and explicit application of heightened scrutiny) to sexual minorities. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:33 pm
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel The timing of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia is prompting much discussion—for example, here, here, here, and here—about whether there are “constitutional conventions” relevant to efforts to fill his seat—or to oppose filling his seat—before the next presidential election. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
Tushnet and Siegel are right. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
” The case for a “collective action federalism” of this sort has been made at greater length by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter in the Stanford Law Review, and by Professor Siegel on these pages. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
SECOND ADDENDUM: Neil Siegel has something on this as well (referring in his post to a forthcoming Va. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am
“I can say that my two newest colleagues are very decent and very smart individuals,” she said Wednesday at an event in Washington, D.C., hosted by Duke Law as she answered questions from Neil Siegel, a law professor and one of her former law clerks. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:47 pm
Professor Neil Siegel also rejects the umpire analogy, using the Supreme Court’s case law on race conscious student assignment to make his point. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
*Neil Siegel analyzes the cert denials as a form of persuading rather than coercing lower courts to strike down same-sex marriage bans, a “passive virtue” (Alexander Bickel’s phrase) that the Court adopts in times of constitutional transition. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am
March 4, 12:30-2 PM, Duke Law School, Rm. 3037, Durham, NC: "How Federalism Protects Sanctuary Cities," panel on "Federalism and Sanctuary Cities" (with Duke law professors Ernie Young and Neil Siegel). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am
Sebelius, Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter discuss their theory of the tax power and how it justifies the Chief Justice’s analysis. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am
” And Amy Wax and Neil Siegel discuss the case in a podcast for Constitution Daily. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
As Neil Siegel (whose constitutional riff is, among the contributors here, closest to mine) appropriately puts it, I am (like him) “a structuralist at heart. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
[Generally cleaned up text and added an update] [UPDATE: From the abstract it looks like Neil Siegel and Bob Cooter anticipated Chief Justice Roberts approach in their paper, Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power and may even have provided him with the road map for his analysis. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Neil Siegel In a new article, I argue that Court-packing—that is, changing the size of the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:30 pm
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel The constitutional text looms large in the recess appointments case, NLRB v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am
Meanwhile, Curtis Bradley and Neil S. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
Professors Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel have described Griswold as “offer[ing] women the most significant constitutional protection since the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote, constitutional protection as important as the cases prohibiting sex discrimination that the Court would decide in the next decade – perhaps even more so. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:20 am
Neil Siegel, in his 2005 critique of Sunstein's work on minimalism - A Theory in Search of a Court, and itself: Judicial Minimalism at the Supreme Court Bar, available online here - has written that "pre-empirically, it appears more likely that whatever costs the Court saves itself by taking a minimalist path will be outweighed by the costs incurred by litigants, lower courts, and, political bodies". [read post]
