Search for: "Neil Siegel"
Results 141 - 160
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 8:05 am
The Internet and digital media, which blend traditional legal experts, journalists, commentators, and the general public, have, if anything, enhanced these features of American constitutional culture.The all-star cast of participants includes: Bruce Ackerman (Yale), Akhil Amar (Yale), Jack Balkin (Yale), Emily Bazelon (Yale, Slate), Joan Biskupic (Reuters News), Sujit Choudhry (NYU), Justin Driver (Texas, New Republic), Garrett Epps (University of Baltimore, American Prospect), Barry Friedman (NYU),… [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:25 pm
As Neil Siegel and I explained in our Anti-Injunction Act article, that particular juxtaposition is difficult to reconcile with the Court's precedents in this area; yet the government advanced the argument anyway. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:45 am
Robert Cooter (UC Berkeley Law) & Neil Siegel (Duke University School of Law) have posted Collective Action Internationalism on SSRN. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
Cato@Liberty, David Koppel of the Volokh Conspiracy, and Jack Balkin, Neil Siegel, and Sandy Levinson at Balkinzation, all offer thoughts on a “limiting principle” for congressional power. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:47 am
Over at Balkinization, Neil Siegel offers Five Limiting Principles. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
I was one of four witnesses; I shared the panel with Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network, Steven Bradbury of Dechert LLP, and Professor Neil Siegel of Duke University Law School. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Neil Siegel and I elaborated this argument earlier in the year in the Yale Law Journal Online. 2) Tomorrow the Court will turn to the merits of the challenges to the minimum coverage provision. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
Brian Galle, Neil Siegel, and my former colleague Max Stearns). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
” Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel have posted an essay on SSRN, available here, arguing that the TAIA only bars suits that have the “immediate purpose” of restraining the collection of taxes. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm
Marty Lederman has offered a splendid analysis of the individual mandate issues here, and, of course, readers of this blog know that Andy Koppelman, Neil Siegel, and I have gone over the doctrinal arguments many times before.So for a change of pace, I point out that, if we use regime theory in political science, the most likely prediction is that a majority of the Justices will defend the basic commitments of the current constitutional regime, which is the New Deal/civil rights… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:05 pm
Cooter (UC-Berkeley) & Neil Siegel (Duke), Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power: Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
Cooter & Neil Siegel. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:20 am
Cooter (University of California, Berkeley - School of Law) & Neil Siegel (Duke University - School of Law) have posted Not the Power to Destroy: A Theory of the Tax Power for a Court that Limits the Commerce Power on SSRN. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:14 am
Dorf and Neil Siegel entitled “Early-Bird Special” Indeed! [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:29 pm
This is what always drives me batty when reading the work of Net pessimists like Neil Postman, Lee Siegel, Andrew Keen, Jaron Lanier, etc. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
Dorf (Cornell) & Neil S. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
(And let me now give credit to Bob Cooter, Rick Hills, and Neil Siegel for laying out most of the intellectual groundwork for this post. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:47 am
Dorf and Neil Siegel (Cornell Law School and Duke University - School of Law) have posted 'Early-Bird Special' Indeed! [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:38 pm
Posted by Mike Dorf My latest Verdict column is co-authored with Duke Law & Poli Sci Professor Neil Siegel. [read post]
